And Jesus asked his father, “How long has this been happening to him?” And he said, “From childhood. And it has often cast him into fire and into water, to destroy him. But if you can do anything, have compassion on us and help us.” And Jesus said to him, “‘If you can’! All things are possible for one who believes.” Immediately the father of the child cried out and said, “I believe; help my unbelief!” And when Jesus saw that a crowd came running together, he rebuked the unclean spirit, saying to it, “You mute and deaf spirit, I command you, come out of him and never enter him again.” And after crying out and convulsing him terribly, it came out, and the boy was like a corpse, so that most of them said, “He is dead.” But Jesus took him by the hand and lifted him up, and he arose. (Mark 9.21-27)

I meet a lot of Christians who beat themselves up over thoughts that “should not go through your mind” (as someone said to me today). This is a very unhealthy approach to dealing with doubts and stray thoughts.
If a thought goes through your mind, you need to be honest with yourself about that thought and deal with it directly. Too many Christians ignore their own thoughts and pretend their doubts do not exist. The dad with the sick boy models for us the best approach, when he said to Jesus: “Lord I believe, help my unbelief.”
The truth is we all have doubts sometimes. God is not offended or threatened by that. Whether we believe in God or not does not affect whether God exists or not. This is the opposite of all the silly Christmas movies where the people have to believe to make the magic work (including Elf which I love anyway).
The worst thing we can do is ignore the thoughts, pretend we don’t have them, then have to live with the self-imposed guilt for the ‘bad’ thoughts and for lying about them. What a vicious cycle. What a waste of time. Bring your doubts to God in prayer. Be honest. Be direct. Then see what happens. I promise you will never regret open and honest dialogue with God.

And yes Paul did tell us to “take every thought captive to obey Christ,” (2 Cor. 10.5), but we have to know this is not something we do in our own power, right? Since when are we able to obey Jesus without the Spirit’s empowerment? The battle with our own thoughts is one of the hardest we will ever fight and thus dependence on God is absolutely necessary. But dependence isn’t lip service. Dependence is what I just described – open, honest dialogue with God. Tell God the truth. God can handle it.
Oh, and learning to tell the truth (to God, others, and ourselves) is one of the foundational habits of spiritual formation. You can’t become a good truth-teller without the Spirit’s help either. So if you can’t bring yourself to have open and honest dialogue with God, admit that in prayer and the Spirit will help you take further steps in becoming a truth-teller (you will have just taken the first).

I am wrapping up teaching a course on the theology of Paul. One of our last topics was Paul’s view of women in ministry. He says some tough things in the Pastorals, which usually leads to one of two responses from us. Either we deny women the upper roles of leadership in the church and thus pay some sort of lip service to Paul (hardly anyone really has women be silent in the church, how in the world could Sunday School exist if no women taught?). Or we ignore Paul.

In the course of the discussion I mentioned the great (not really, but it should be) Junia conspiracy from Rom. 16 (that’s a post for another day), where she gets a gender change by modern translators because Paul calls her an apostle (4 in 5 chance the closest Bible to you right now gets this wrong, except the old KJV, which has it right oddly enough) which led to one student asking me these questions (I don’t have anything else parenthetical to say in this run-on sentence, but 4 makes a personal record I think). “Can a woman be an apostle? Can a woman have authority in the church?” I thought my response came out well enough that you might want to read it too.

Well, the first thing I would say is that we need to completely recast how we think about authority in the church. The only one who gets to “have” authority (possess it) is the Holy Spirit. The rest of us just get to exercise it as the Spirit sees fit. If we walk outside of this, we are being disobedient (and yes I think disobedience is rampant in the church. Thankfully we serve a gracious God.)

The second thing I will say is that authority in the church should always look like the authority Jesus displayed – servant leadership. He made a big deal of this when He washed the disciples’ feet (Jn. 13) but most of our leaders pretend this never happened.

Given those two statements, I would say yes, women can and do exercise authority in the church. In fact, I think this happens a lot now, where the true ministry and kingdom growth is going on in children’s Sunday School, in food pantries, in so many ways that “fly under the radar” of the big powerful pastors and deacons who are busy wielding their power and building their little fiefdoms and not doing God’s work, not building Christ’s kingdom at all. And I am an elder so I am judging myself here as much as anyone. It breaks my heart all the time we waste playing power games in church.

Jesus came and turned all these power structures upside down. We work so hard to turn them back over and get back to comfortable. We need Jesus to stand us on our heads again. Always.

Not bad, eh? So here’s a prayer you could join me in: Jesus please break us of our power addiction. Make us uncomfortable. Make us feet washers. Make us servant leaders. (It’s okay, God hears when you pray in html.) Make us interested in your glory and building your kingdom and disinterested in self-promotion and being in control. Fill us with the perspective of John the Baptizer: let us decrease so you can increase. Amen.

There are two ways to consider doubt as I see it. Sometimes doubt exists in a person as an obstacle to truth, a persistent doubt that causes a person to reject the most basic truth. You have experienced this I am sure. I have one child who is a very picky eater. The other day I was trying to get her to taste something new (I forget what it was now). I know what she likes and had tried it and I was convinced she would like it, but her doubt disabled her from accepting the truth of what I was telling her. This is doubt rooted in fear. That is important because the solution to this kind of doubt is not mental persuasion, but overcoming the fear.

There is another kind of doubt though that is healthy. This kind of doubt has more to do with being fully aware of our own mental and physical limitations, our own propensity to think wrong or be deceived. In my experience, teenagers lack this doubt altogether, as it comes with age and experience. It is more a healthy skepticism about our ability to know things as they are. I think this doubt is healthy because it clearly sees and understands the gap between what we know and what we believe, that is what we can reason and what we must take on faith.

People who lack this doubt do not have faith, they only have ideology. The truth is that my understanding of God is always limited and faulty, not because God is faulty, but because I have a limited finite mind that can only reach so far. Faith is a gift of the Holy Spirit precisely in that God reaches across that gap. Kant is right in that I cannot reach up to God, but Kant is wrong in that God does reach down to me. And the only people who can appreciate this fact are those who have enough healthy doubt to feel the limit of their reach and the gap that leaves.

“Jesus was judgmental, as the psychotherapist is not, or at least theoretically is not supposed to be. Jesus got in people’s way and told them they were doing wrong. He told them to stop and turn around. He did not tell them they were accepted as they were. He told them they could be accepted, and that God is an accepting God. He said that to be accepted by God also means right now to become a different person.” – John Howard Yoder Preface to Theology p.327

How about it? Has the Spirit of Jesus gotten in your way lately? Do you stop and turn around when he tells you to? Did you know that was part of the deal? You may have missed that part. It pays to read the fine print.

Oh, and by the way, this doesn’t mean the song Just As I Am is wrong – but it does mean we might need to sing another one after it that says: okay now that you’re here, it’s time to change.

A good friend asked me today what I thought about openness theology. This was my response.

This would be a long discussion, but in general I think both sides get this wrong by allowing outside concepts (by which I mean outside the revelation of God in Jesus Christ found in Scripture) to govern how we conceive of God and how we frame theological discussions. The openness people are as guilty as those they oppose of continuing to follow the framework of Greek philosophy. (Just like postmodernity is still bound by the concepts of modernity; rejection of an idea by itself does not free you from the idea.)

What if, instead of beginning either with the standard attributes (the omnis, immutability, impassibility) as most conservative theologies do (both Protestant and Catholic), OR beginning with a rejection of these (as openness or process theologies do), what if we began with the most certain fact we have: the God we are dealing with is the One Jesus calls “Father,” the One whom Jesus claimed his followers had already seen in Jesus himself. What if we then went on to describe this Father as the God of Israel – the One who related so openly to Moses, to Elijah, to Isaiah, to Jeremiah, etc. There is so much we can know and deduce about this God, and almost none of it fits easily into the Greek framework that so many of us still insist on using.

Why is that?

I think the main reason is because we are more like the children of Israel than we are like Moses. This God scares us to death. We would much rather deal with concepts we can understand, golden calves we can mold, rather than climb the scary mountain topped with holy fire.

Theology can all too quickly devolve from a worthwhile quest to understand God better into a religiously cloaked barrier that insulates us from the God who seeks us. Don’t let false questions and categories forged from others’ melted down concepts cloud your vision of the Father of Jesus Christ.

I was reading something today that encouraged leaders to be patient with difficult people, specifically with people who ‘get in their way.’ On the surface, this made sense to me, but at the same time it bothered me. As I thought about why, I came to this conclusion.

I think patience is something leaders try to lean on when their focus is really on the wrong thing. These leaders think it is important to be patient with people who are not fully on board with the vision they have cast, are not fully heading in the right direction, are basically not following well. The problem with this, as I see it, is those leaders are too focused on their vision, on what they want to see done, on something other than the people they are supposed to be leading.

Having a vision is important for any leader, but it cannot take the place of that leader’s understanding of his or her purpose and mission, which is not to achieve some goal or realize some vision – it is to lead people. The purpose and mission of those people is the goal and vision, but the leader’s is the people themselves. So when I see leaders getting frustrated with people (because those folks need some leadership) I know that leader has yet to understand that his or her very existence as a leader depends on such people who need to be led.

The leader is getting frustrated with what is really the core of his or her job – to lead people. That would be like a chef who get frustrated that food needs cooking or that people are hungry. If the food didn’t need cooking or if people weren’t hungry, we wouldn’t need you, chef. If not for the people you need patience for, i.e., those who need leading, we wouldn’t need you, leader.

Leaders don’t need patience nearly as much as they need to care more about the people they are leading than anything they want to achieve. Develop your people into achievers, then you will have led well.

[Btw, I'm not saying leaders don't need patience at all (despite my attempt at a provocative title), but they don't need to use patience as a cop out merely to tolerate people they can't stand.]

Just the other day I was in line at Chick-fil-A getting some breakfast. There were two registers open, but everyone was kind of waiting in one line, going to whichever register came open first (there were only about 5 people in line). A man came in, got in back of the line, and immediately began saying very rude things to the man in front of him, complaining that the man wasn’t picking a line. After a good bit of verbal abuse, the man in front said (in a more polite voice than I would likely have used), “Okay, I’ll just stay in this line (he pointed at the left register).” The man behind him was not satisfied but continued to berate the other, even threatening him with violence.

The young girl who had taken my order (I was waiting on my food) told the man to calm down or she would call the authorities. This did not have a positive impact. Instead the man became incensed and began cursing everyone, yelled something about getting his gun, and then started to walk out. As he got to the door, however, he was confronted by two policemen. They may have been detectives because they were not wearing uniforms, but shirts and ties. Each did have a clearly visible firearm on his belt. They took the man outside and were still talking to him when I left with my food (I took it to go).

Do you know what I said during this dramatic vignette? Nothing. I did not say a word. All of this occurred behind me. I did not even turn around. I saw some of it out of the corner of my eye, and I heard everything very clearly, but I only ever looked at the man as he was heading to the door and met the officers he did not know were present. Until that moment, however, I kept my face forward, studying the menus (even though I had already ordered and know the menu well enough by now that I never read it anyway).

Amy and the kids were waiting in the car for me and were eager to know what all the drama was about (the man and the officers were having quite a conversation still outside). I told them and Amy thought I did the right thing by ignoring it. She thought I would have only made it worse, that nothing could have helped. I’m not so sure. Maybe in this instance she is right. But I worry about the tendency we have as humans to ignore, to look the other way, to remain passive and uninvolved. How many people did this in Nazi Germany? How many did this more recently in Rwanda or in Darfur? How many are doing this now as civil discourse seems to have become a lost art? Are there only screaming voices left because too many of us refuse to speak up?

Of course, this little situation is completely insignificant compared to those. But that does not seem to make me feel better. If I can’t speak peace into a queue squabble at the local CFA, how is more than that possible?

Are there times when we make situations worse, not by what we say, but by our unwillingness to say anything at all?

(This is a sermon I preached a while back. Some of you have read it already on Facebook, or heard it live. For the rest, I hope this stirs your heart and mind as we move toward Easter.)

Mk. 15.21-39 Ps. 22.1-24

My God, my God, why have you forsaken me? This is a difficult question, perhaps the most difficult thing Jesus says at any point in the Gospels. It is shocking, terrifying, and puts a strain on our understanding of who Jesus is and what went on that day outside Jerusalem. Since Jesus is quoting Ps. 22 here, some have sought to use the more positive outcome of that Psalm to make Jesus’ statement less negative and scandalous. But “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” is pretty hard to spin into something positive; if Jesus wanted to make some kind of victory statement, it seems like he could have done better than this. But you are probably more familiar with the explanation that goes along with a particular way of explaining salvation. Some say that on the cross, Jesus took on the sin of the world, and since sin is something God cannot be around, God really did abandon Jesus on the cross at this moment. At this moment Jesus bore the weight of the sin of the world, was rejected by God, and suffered the consequence of our sin on our behalf so that we don’t have to. If you saw the Mel Gibson movie The Passion you may remember this moment when the single, big tear falls from the sky. If you’ve been around a little longer you may be able to reach back and remember the Carman song “The Champion” which narrates a cosmic boxing match between Jesus and Satan. At one point, Satan kills Jesus, and there is this line I can still remember, “God the Father turned his head, his tears announcing Christ was dead.” Do you remember that? It was a while back. I think I still had a mullet with the bottom part permed, like Billy Ray Cyrus. Man those were the days. Anyway, I want to talk to you this morning for a few minutes about all of this, because I think the Lord has given me a word for you. I’m not sure if this is a word for certain individuals here, or if this is a word for the Wake Forest Vineyard as a community. Maybe its both.

No matter how many times I read it, I just can’t get over the shock of Jesus saying this: my God, my God why have you forsaken ME? As you read through the Gospels, Jesus is pretty clear that he understood his mission to be this very thing – to go to Jerusalem and die a violent death at the hands of the religious and political authorities and then to rise from the dead. He tells his disciples this specifically on a number of occasions, although they either ignore him, or don’t understand what he’s saying – or that one time Peter actually tried to rebuke Jesus for saying it. Yeah, that went well for Peter, didn’t it? Yet, as he is hanging there dying and in extraordinary pain, Jesus has this moment that you may be familiar with – a moment when he feels completely abandoned by God. And in that moment, Jesus finds the words he needs in the Psalms, because David has been there too. In fact, many people in the Bible had this sort of experience: Moses, Elijah, Job, Jeremiah, Peter, and Paul to name a few. You have probably felt this way too. I know I have. You might even be feeling that way right now. As awful as it is, it is a very common experience, because we are humans and our connection to God is never so secure that it is beyond the possibility of doubt. We need to be honest about this. David was. The Psalms are so great, because you can find the words to pray in just about any situation. If you’re scared, or lonely, or feeling forsaken, or full of joy, and ready to shout, whatever, there’s a Psalm for you. The Psalms teach us how to pray honest. We may as well pray honest, because lying to God is a pretty futile exercise. The only one we ever fool is ourselves. And here Jesus is, praying honestly, expressing that he – as a fully human being, completely able to identify with us, full of the same nervous system and psyche that we have – feels utterly abandoned by God. He has done exactly what the Father has told him to do. He even stopped in Gethsemane to check one last time to make sure the plan was still on. He knows he is going to die – really die – and then be raised three days later. He knows all of this and trusts it completely. But the pain, the pain, and the mocking, and he cries out, “my God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” Have you ever asked that or something like it? Have you ever done what you thought the Lord told you to do, something you double checked on and carried out as carefully and obediently as you could, only to have the whole thing seem to fall apart – your whole life crash down around you? I have been there too and so I have to think that Jesus really meant what he said here, he wasn’t thinking of the happy ending of Ps. 22, he wasn’t trying for some victory cry, he was asking this because he felt completely forsaken.

And it is an entirely legitimate question, “why have you FORSAKEN me?”, because forsaking does not seem to fit with the nature or track record of the God of Israel. There in verse 3 and 4 of Ps. 22, David says, “Yet you are holy, enthroned on the praises of Israel. In you our fathers trusted, and you delivered them. To you they cried and were rescued; in you they trusted and were not put to shame.” This the God David and Jesus call “my God.” This is the God who creates the universe, who conquers Pharaoh and parts the Red Sea. This is the God for forty years in the desert appears as a constant pillar of cloud by day and fire by night. This is the God who pulls down the walls of Jericho, who gives this same David victory after victory, and who does so many miracles through Jesus, far more than we even have record of, according to John. Yet there are those times when forsaken or abandoned is exactly what we appear to be. Job served God faithfully all his life, and yet in a single day all of his children were killed and all of his wealth was gone. Elijah witnessed the most awesome display of God’s power on Mt. Caramel, and then ran for his life, hiding in despair from Jezebel, who wanted to murder him for exposing her god as false. You know maybe you really feel most forsaken when you’re in this place, like Job, Elijah, and Jesus, where you have experienced the power of God, you have been close, really close to him, and then feel all alone. It’s hard to miss something you never had, and you know the old saying, “you don’t know what you’ve got until it’s gone.” Maybe that’s where you are. Maybe you have had that kind of Mt. Caramel experience with God, or walked quietly and faithfully with Him for years like Job, only to see it unravel or find yourself hiding in a cave. That’s where Jesus was that day on Skull Hill.

When you’re there, when you have personally known how powerful God is and how much He can do and has done in your life, only now He’s not, there comes this question, WHY? What have I done to deserve this? How have I offended You, Lord? Am I being punished? Am I being tested? Am I being attacked by the enemy? Are you there? Why have you forsaken me? This question – this why – is the question that Job’s friends tried so long and hard – like 35 chapters – to answer. All of their answers were carefully thought out, well reasoned, eloquently spoken – and completely wrong. You remember how Job ends – God shows up – but He never answers Job’s question, He never explains why. As I mentioned before, some people try to answer Jesus’ question here on God’s behalf – just as Job’s friends did – by saying that God abandoned Jesus once the weight of the sin of the world was on him. In this view, Jesus’ death was a payment that God demanded, a satisfaction of divine judgment on the human race. And we have to be very careful here, because such an answer comes so close to being true, that it becomes hard to see the flaw, which makes it all the more dangerous. It is true that Jesus was the spotless lamb, the atoning sin sacrifice that did what animal sacrifice could not do. As Heb. 10.4 tells us, “it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.” But Hebrews also points out that Jesus began this work – he took on the sin of humanity – not on the cross, but by becoming a human to begin with. Heb. 2:14-18 says, “Because God’s children are human beings—made of flesh and blood—the Son also became flesh and blood. For only as a human being could he die, and only by dying could he break the power of the devil, who had the power of death. Only in this way could he set free all who have lived their lives as slaves to the fear of dying. Therefore, it was necessary for him to be made in every respect like us, his brothers and sisters, so that he could be our merciful and faithful High Priest before God. Then he could offer a sacrifice that would take away the sins of the people. Since he himself has gone through suffering and testing, he is able to help us when we are being tested.” We see the same thing in the familiar passage from Philippians (2.5-8): “Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.” These passages show us two things. First they do show that the death of Jesus was necessary for our salvation. But they also show us that equally necessary was Jesus becoming a fully human being just as we are. He bore our sinful nature, our sorrow, all the difficulties and struggles that go along with being human in this fallen world. And he did not bear all of that for only a few hours on the cross – he bore them for 30 years! When we focus solely on his death, when we reduce the ministry of Jesus to this single moment, we miss so much of what he came to do. He saves us not only by his death, but by showing us how to live a life controlled by the Spirit. We are not called to be merely the recipients of his atoning work – we are called to be his disciples – people who follow him and have the same mindset of serving and self-sacrificing that Jesus had, not only on the cross, but through his whole life.

Besides, an explanation of the atonement does not answer Jesus’ question. He was not asking why he had to die, he was clear on that point, what he was asking is why he had been abandoned in the process. It’s like he’s saying, “you know, it’s enough that I’m dying here, do you have to go and leave me alone too? Can’t you at least stay with me while I go through this?” And this is where the distinction we just made helps us. We know that the Father was well pleased with Jesus at his baptism and at the Transfiguration. We know that Jesus was full of the Holy Spirit. We know that he prayed regularly and claimed that he was only doing what the Father told him to do. He lived in obedience to the Father and relied on the power of the Holy Spirit. We know all of this. We also see that Jesus took on our sin when he became human – during the whole of his ministry he had the same human nature that you and I have. He laid aside all of his divine prerogatives and lived as a regular (though sinless – an important distinction) human. Even his sinlessness was a mark of his obedience to the Father and his reliance on the Spirit. There was no moment when God dumped our sins on Jesus, so there was sinless Jesus, then boom, there was Jesus with all our sin. He did bear our sins as Isaiah 53 says, but he did this from the beginning. He is “lamb slain from the foundation of the world.” So there was no moment when God the Father turned his head. There was no single big tear drop, then the Father going somewhere else to cry. We get it wrong when we try to answer this why because Jesus was not forsaken, he was not abandoned. The Father didn’t go anywhere. The Holy Spirit did not leave Jesus. We have to know this, because we know Jesus is God – there was no time when the Trinity was short a member. Jesus was not expelled from the divine community. On the contrary, Jesus brought death, suffering, abandonment, and forsakenness into the life of the Godhead. This was too much for death, of course, it could not remain in the presence of so much LIFE. Jesus destroyed death precisely by embracing it, by bringing into the life of God. Death had no power there, and was rendered powerless by Jesus.

And this is the word of the Lord for you this morning – you have not been forsaken. Jesus was not forsaken, and neither are you. You have not been abandoned. You have not been forsaken, you are not being forsaken now, and you will never be forsaken. This is what the Lord told Joshua who had gone off alone and afraid before the battle: “Just as I was with Moses, so I will be with you. I will not leave you or forsake you.” (Josh. 1.5) This is what we read in Ps. 22: “For he has not despised or abhorred the affliction of the afflicted, and he has not hidden his face from him, but has heard, when he cried to him.” (Ps. 22.24) This is what Paul tells us in Romans: “For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.” (8.38-39) And I’m not just saying, “Oh, don’t worry about how you feel, that’s not real, God’s really with you, just hang in there.” If that’s all I had to say, we could have been at lunch by now. Hear me. What I am saying is that forsakenness that you have felt, that you may be feeling right now, is something Jesus completely identifies with. It’s not just that you have experienced it, like David, and Job, and Elijah, and so many of us – it is that God himself has felt this too. Jesus knows what it means to cry out to God even when the circumstances say that God is not there. But he cries out because God does hear. And we follow him and cry out as well. And the Lord hears our cry and just as Jesus is raised from the dead so the power of God comes into our lives and does the impossible. I think he wants to do some impossible things in this church. I think he wants to do some impossible things in your life. I think Jesus wants to lead you into living a lives of obedience to the Father by relying on the Holy Spirit just as he did. I know you have felt forsaken, and more importantly, Jesus knows and understands completely. That’s why he sent me here this morning to tell you that you are not forsaken.

Everyone operates based on some set of ethical principles. Most often there are a number of sources for this: your upbringing, your culture, your church, your job, your personal preferences, what you read, what you watch and listen to, who your friends are, etc. I know people like to say that their ethic is based solely on the word of God but this not usually true (how many of us have sold all our possessions and given them to the poor?). The truth is, what we read in the word of God informs and influences our ethic, and it often takes the stance of seeking to overcome some of the other influences I just named. It is important for us to recognize two things:

1. what our ethic is right now

2. what we think it ought to be

We have to be really honest with ourselves to make that first recognition and we can only begin to move toward inplementing the second to the extent that we have honestly assessed the first. So how about it, do you know where your ethic is?

The other day a friend was praying for me and got this word from the Lord:

You have so many shoulds in your life. They are robbing you of your freedom. The Lord doesn’t do shoulds.

That word was very accurate and well-timed (as you might expect when the Lord speaks). I have so many shoulds in my life – I should have done this, I shouldn’t have done that. Dwelling on those has become a hobby, an obsession on the past that robs my focus and energy for the present, the moment, the now that is all I have and all I am responsible for.

This is something I already know mentally, but need to learn to put into practice. Dorothy Day first taught me the importance of doing what comes to hand, to “be responsible only for the one action of the present moment.” (Loaves and Fishes, p.176) With all moments before now, I have either done wrong and need to repent, or I have done well and need to remain humble about that. But all of those moments are gone, only now matters.

There is no should, then, there is only what was. I may need to receive (or give) forgiveness, but dwelling on where I think I went wrong avails me nothing. In fact, it does the opposite. It takes away my ability to enjoy my freedom now. It becomes one more way to procrastinate and avoid the freedom that I am secretly (well until right now) afraid of. I don’t have to fear my future or my freedom.

Neither do you. The Lord shared this word with my friend specifically for me, but I think it might also be good for some of you to hear as well. I like that our God does not do should.